|
Post by blkpanther on May 6, 2008 15:50:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by posterchild on May 6, 2008 16:19:03 GMT -5
not good.
|
|
|
Post by jdsippin on May 6, 2008 16:48:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MaXx on May 6, 2008 19:15:16 GMT -5
Why is baseball the only one mentioned on ESPN's site then? In the PDF file it seems that baseball is the only one that had a second warning. Or am I missing something.
|
|
|
Post by jdsippin on May 6, 2008 19:59:03 GMT -5
yes they are the only one with two scores in a row under 900 which renders historical penalties...if they fail to meet it this year they will be banned from post season play
|
|
|
Post by MaXx on May 6, 2008 20:19:39 GMT -5
yes they are the only one with two scores in a row under 900 which renders historical penalties...if they fail to meet it this year they will be banned from post season play Ok, so that means that the basketball and football teams have improved correct?
|
|
|
Post by jdsippin on May 6, 2008 22:17:28 GMT -5
not sure...they don't have last years scores online anymore
|
|
|
Post by FIUPantherFan on May 7, 2008 7:29:50 GMT -5
yes they are the only one with two scores in a row under 900 which renders historical penalties...if they fail to meet it this year they will be banned from post season play It's a good thing Pete is around to "correct" the anti Garcia/Turtle spin machine that seems to only appear when negative news are around, there has been significant improvement for the '06-'07 school year so I expect more of the same next year and to finally dig ourselves our of the HOLE that we were left with by the PREVIOUS administration and coaches.... Go F I U To read an UNBIASED report of the APR result for the 2006 and 2007 school year, hit the links... www.miamiherald.com/sports/colleges/fiu/story/523995.htmlmiamiherald.typepad.com/fiusports/2008/05/apr-bottom-line.html
|
|
|
Post by MaXx on May 7, 2008 18:09:15 GMT -5
I love Pete's blog, but I can't stand the scUM who post on there.
|
|
|
Post by FIUPantherFan on May 7, 2008 19:16:29 GMT -5
I understand Pete's dilema, I really believe he should regulate the blog. When we first started this board it was free for anyone to post and there were certain posters that made the board uncomfortable for people. Pete has to realize that his space is geared towards FIU people not um haters, FIU supporters are going to be turned off by that garbage and will stop visiting his blog as often (I know I have). I'm fine discussing FIU issues be they positive or negative, however, I don't want to discuss SCum issues or deal with their fans at all. Go F I U!
|
|
|
Post by MaXx on May 7, 2008 21:15:41 GMT -5
I understand Pete's dilema, I really believe he should regulate the blog. When we first started this board it was free for anyone to post and there were certain posters that made the board uncomfortable for people. Pete has to realize that his space is geared towards FIU people not um haters, FIU supporters are going to be turned off by that garbage and will stop visiting his blog as often (I know I have). I'm fine discussing FIU issues be they positive or negative, however, I don't want to discuss SCum issues or deal with their fans at all. Go F I U! I've found myself the same way. I still like the information he provides but I've found myself avoiding the comments section altogether. I hate that I let myself get involved with their crap, I've decided I will not post anymore on there in anyway related to that other school.
|
|
|
Post by yippee on May 7, 2008 23:09:47 GMT -5
I understand Pete's dilema, I really believe he should regulate the blog. When we first started this board it was free for anyone to post and there were certain posters that made the board uncomfortable for people. Pete has to realize that his space is geared towards FIU people not um haters, FIU supporters are going to be turned off by that garbage and will stop visiting his blog as often (I know I have). I'm fine discussing FIU issues be they positive or negative, however, I don't want to discuss SCum issues or deal with their fans at all. Go F I U! I think if people just stop responding back to them they won't get fired up to write more. I know it sucks to read when people talk back about our school and our teams but it feeds the fire when people write back.
|
|